论放任

在确定间接故意的诸种见解中,容认说基本上是合理的。放任的存在与否,必须结合行为人对构成要件结果的发生是否有高度盖然性认识,是否存在认真的估算,是否对结果的实现毫不在意并认可、接受这一结果这三个层次的内容进行递进式判断。在区别放任和轻率时要考虑行为人对客观危险的认识、对结果是纵容还是有防止结果的真挚努力。

On Indulgence

Among different views on the indirect intent, the doctrine of toleration is basically reasonable. Whether indulgence exists or not, we must progressively judge three levels that whether the actor has knowledge of deeply probability on the consequence of constitutive requirements, whether the actor has serious estimation for consequence, and whether the actor is unconcerned about consequence and, moreover, the actor approves of and accepts consequence. When we distinguish indulgence from recklessness, we should simultaneously consider the actor is conniving at the knowledge of objective dangerousness and consequence, or sincerely trying hard to prevent consequence