Fairness and participation in evaluation procedures: Effects on task attitudes and performance |
| |
Authors: | Ruth Kanfer John Sawyer P. Christopher Earley E. Allan Lind |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois;(2) Department of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona;(3) The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California;(4) Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Elliott Hall, 75 E. River Road, 55455 Minneapolis, Minnesota |
| |
Abstract: | A laboratory study was conducted to examine the role of two components of participatory work evaluation procedures on fairness attitudes and work performance. Opportunity for influential opinion expression and knowledge of evaluation criteria were manipulated in a business simulation exercise. Thirty-eight male and 49 female undergraduates worked under a task evaluation procedure that either did or did not allow them to express their opinions to the evaluator. In addition, subjects either were or were not provided with specific information about the criteria to be used in making the performance evaluation, and they received either a favorable or an unfavorable outcome. Questionnaire responses indicated that influential opinion expression enhanced perceptions of procedural and distributive fairness independently of the outcome of the evaluation. Both knowledge of evaluation criteria and perceptions of evaluation fairness correlated with subsequent task performance. The implications of these findings are discussed with respect to understanding the influence of procedural justice on attitudes and task behavior in organizational settings. |
| |
Keywords: | procedural justice organizational behavior social psychology participation performance appraisal |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|