| “前卫”的法官已让案例走在立法的前面 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 何海波. “前卫”的法官已让案例走在立法的前面[J]. 中国法律, 2009, 0(3): 45-46,98-99 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 何海波 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我讨论的背景是中国的行政诉讼。按照《行政诉讼法》第54条，如果一个具体行政行为违反法定程序的话，法院可以判决撤销或部分撤销此行政行为。什麽是法定程序呢？立法并没有给出明确的说法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 立法 《行政诉讼法》 违反法定程序 具体行政行为 案例 法官 前卫 判决撤销 |
＂Avant-courier＂ judges have enabled legal precedents to precede legislation |
| |
| By He Haibo. ＂Avant-courier＂ judges have enabled legal precedents to precede legislation[J]. , 2009, 0(3): 45-46,98-99 |
| |
| Authors: | By He Haibo |
| |
| Abstract: | The background for my discussion lies in administrative proceedings in China. According to Article 54 of the Administrative Procedure Law of China, if a specific administrative act is found to be in violation of a prescribed procedure, the court concerned can give a judgment to totally or partially abolish the administrative act. But what is a prescribed procedure？ Chinese legislation does not give a clear-cut answer. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
