The Role of Victim-Related Factors in Victim Restitution: A Multi-Method Analysis of Restitution in Pennsylvania |
| |
Authors: | Email author" target="_blank">R?Barry?RubackEmail author Jennifer?N?Shaffer |
| |
Institution: | (1) Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802;(2) Arizona State University-West, Phoenix, AZ, 5069;(3) Department of Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802 |
| |
Abstract: | Mandatory statutes do not always produce change, but a 1995 Pennsylvania statutory change making restitution mandatory dramatically
increased the proportion of cases in which restitution was imposed. There are three possible reasons for this generally successful
implementation: (a) judges agreed with the victim-centered goals of the statute, (b) there were mechanisms in place to implement
the goals of assisting victims, and (c) there was a context supportive of victims that made it easier to follow the law. Two
studies investigated these possible explanations. First, a statewide survey of trial court judges suggested that they agreed
with the statute's goals of compensating victims. Second, hierarchical logistic models of 55,119 statewide restitution-eligible
decisions indicated that a victim-related contextual factor, the nature and location of the victim/witness assistance office,
was significantly related to the imposition of restitution, although a more general contextual factor relating to funding
for victim programs had only small effects. |
| |
Keywords: | victims restitution sentencing contextual factors statutory implementation |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|