极端与中庸的摩擦理想与现实的取舍——柏拉图与亚里士多德的政体观之比较 |
| |
引用本文: | 严晶.极端与中庸的摩擦理想与现实的取舍——柏拉图与亚里士多德的政体观之比较[J].天水行政学院学报,2011,12(5):8-11. |
| |
作者姓名: | 严晶 |
| |
作者单位: | 苏州大学法学院,江苏苏州,215006 |
| |
摘 要: | 作为古希腊历史上两位著名的思想家,柏拉图与亚里士多德均对古希腊的政体进行了细致的研究,并形成了自己独特的政体观。两者在政体的分类、政体治理的模式及混合政体的具体实施上都有不同的见解。相比而言,柏拉图比较理想,而亚里士多德则更为务实。两者的政体观奠定了后世政治思想的基础,且均对后世的政治实践产生了深远的影响。
|
关 键 词: | 政体观 混合政体 法治 |
Plato's Political System in Comparison with Aristotle's |
| |
Authors: | YAN Jing |
| |
Institution: | YAN Jing(Wang Jian Law School of Soochow University,Suzhou 215006,China) |
| |
Abstract: | As the greatest ancient thinkers in history, Plato and Aristotle both created an unique political system theory based on careful researches. Aristotle differed with Plato on several facts: sorts and mode of political system, realization of mixed political theory. In a word, Plato was more ideal than Aristotle. Both of their political systems laid the basis for future political thoughts, but also the political practice has had a profound impact. |
| |
Keywords: | political system mixed political system rule of law |
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录! |