海峡两岸仲裁制度比较

诉讼和仲裁都是解决经济贸易纠纷的重要方式,但是,在涉外经贸中,当事人多倾向于寻求仲裁这一手段。就内地与台湾两地交往而言,仲裁已成为解决争议的主要途径。然而,两地在仲裁制度方面存在着诸多差异。两地在立法、法律渊源、仲裁员、仲裁协议、仲裁机构等方面有着很大的不同,上述几方面的比较研究,无论在理论上还是在实践上,都具有一定意义。本文从两岸经贸交流的现状出发,分析产生争议的原因,对解决争议的诸多方法作出比较。

Compare Arbitration System of the Two Sides of Cross-straits

Both litigation and arbitration are important way that solves the economy trade dispute,but,in concern foreign affairs of economic trade,the party concerned inclines toward to look for to arbitration much.In regard to associations between the hinterland and Taiwan,arbitration has become main path of solving the controversy.However,there are many differences concerning arbitration system in two sides,especially in such aspects as legislation,origin,arbitrator,arbitral agreement and arbitral organization etc. The above-mentioned comparisons have certain meaning for both theory and practice.Beginning from present condition of economic communication between the two sides,the article analyzes the reason of controversy and compares the methods of solving the controversy.