民事诉讼非法证据排除规则探析

外国法院对民事诉讼非法证据一般较为宽容,不象刑事诉讼那样积极排除。我国民事诉讼中对非法证据的界定先后经历了旧标准和新标准两个阶段。虽然新标准较之旧标准而言科学一些,但其仍然比较严苛,依其而定的非法证据的范围还是十分宽泛,这既不符合我国的具体国情,也与法院对待民事诉讼非法证据应宽大为怀的基本态度有所不一。基于此,我国民事诉讼非法证据排除规则尚有重建之必要。

A Probe on the Rule of Eliminating Illegal Evidence in Civil Litigation

Foreign courts show tolerance towards illegal evidence in civil litigation while it is eliminated in criminal litigation.In China's civil litigation there are two standards to define illegal evidence in civil litigation.Although the new standard is more scientific,it is still rigor.The scope established by it is broad and it is not suitable for our national condition.In addition it is different from the basic idea that the court should have tolerance towards the illegal evidence in civil litigation.Therefore,the elimination rule of illegal evidence in civil litigation should be rebuilt.