首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论地方人大常委会对地方“两院”规范性文件备案审查的正当性
引用本文:李龙,李豪. 论地方人大常委会对地方“两院”规范性文件备案审查的正当性[J]. 时代法学, 2011, 9(6): 3-7
作者姓名:李龙  李豪
作者单位:武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉,430072
摘    要:地方法院和检察院制定的规范性文件是否应纳入同级人大常委会规范性文件备案审查范围,争议已久。目前对地方“两院”规范性文件采取的内部监督方式,无疑缺乏刚性和公信力。地方人大常委会对同级地方“两院”规范性文件备案审查的正当性一方面基于它的权利属性,另一方面也不存在所谓个案监督、干涉司法权独立等情形。

关 键 词:规范性文件  备案审查  司法权

On the Legitimacy about the Standing Committee of Local People's Congress to Requests the Normative Documents Put on Record and Review that the Local People's Courts and the People's Procuratorate has Made
Li Long,LI Hao. On the Legitimacy about the Standing Committee of Local People's Congress to Requests the Normative Documents Put on Record and Review that the Local People's Courts and the People's Procuratorate has Made[J]. Presentday Law Science, 2011, 9(6): 3-7
Authors:Li Long  LI Hao
Affiliation:( Law School of Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430072,China)
Abstract:It"s a long controversial issue whether The Normative documents that local people’s courts and the people’s procuratorate has made to put on record and review to the the same level of Standing Committee of Local People’s Congress or not .The article points out that the current internal supervision mode is lack of rigidity and credibility. And it try to place standing on the legitimacy that The Standing Committee of Local People’s Congress to requests the normative documents put on record and review that the local people’s courts and the people’s Procuratorate has made through refuting the opinion That the case supervision, admitting and intervening that the independence of judicial power
Keywords:normative documents  to put on record and review  judicature
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号