Rethinking Representation from a Communal Perspective |
| |
Authors: | Mia Costa Kaylee T. Johnson Brian F. Schaffner |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Department of Political Science,University of Massachusetts Amherst,Amherst,USA |
| |
Abstract: | Most foundational theories of congressional representation were developed during an era of less polarized and less partisan politics. These theories viewed the incumbency advantage as buttressed by the fact that some constituents were willing to support legislators from the opposite party because of their “home styles.” But in an era of policy immoderation in Congress, this perspective leads to an assumption that citizens evaluate their members of Congress based on what those legislators do for them individually, rather than what they do for their districts more broadly. In this paper, we ask whether citizens take the interests of their fellow constituents into account when evaluating their members of Congress. Using both survey data and an experiment, we uncover support for the notion that citizens take a more communal view of representation as at least part of their evaluations of their representatives. This suggests individuals may have a more nuanced understanding of representation than purely self-interested approaches tend to assume. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|