| “司法权威”与“学术权威”的竞存——由“专家法律意见书”存在的几点悖论引发的思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 柳砚涛,刘孝堂.“司法权威”与“学术权威”的竞存——由“专家法律意见书”存在的几点悖论引发的思考[J].河南公安高等专科学校学报,2008,17(2):44-48. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 柳砚涛 刘孝堂 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100 [2]北京大学法学院,100871 |
| |
| 摘 要： | “专家法律意见书”从性质上说不属于证据，而属于学理解释的范畴。目前，我国法律实践中的专家意见书存在亟须规范的问题，包括以“学术权威”压迫“司法权威”、以专家意见干涉司法独立等。参考国外相关的立法例．在我国的司法实践中，法院应拒绝接收“专家法律意见书”，并采取相应的替代性措施。
|
| 关 键 词： | “专家法律意见书” 司法权威 学术权威 |
Competitive Survival of either ＂Judicial Authority＂ or ＂Academic Authority＂ |
| |
| Institution: | LIU Yan-tao, LIU Xiao-tang (1 .Law School of Shandong University, Jinan Shandong China 250100; 2.Law School of Beijing University, Beijing China 100871) |
| |
| Abstract: | In nature, the ＂legal suggestion of experts＂ is a form of academic interpretation, rather than evidence. Currently, it has lots of problems, which require be considering and resolving in judicial practice of China, such as the suppression of ＂academic authority＂ to ＂judicial authority＂ and the interference of experts＇ suggestion to judicial independence. Referring to some related foreign regulations, the present thesis recommends that the court should reject the ＂legal suggestion of experts＂ in practice and resort to some alternative measures. |
| |
| Keywords: | Legal suggestion of experts Judicial authority： Academic authority |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
