| 债务承担新探 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 戴红兵,陈发桂. 债务承担新探[J]. 广西政法管理干部学院学报, 2001, 16(4): 7-9 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 戴红兵 陈发桂 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 武汉大学法学院,武汉,430072
2. 广西大学法学院,南宁,530004 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 传统债法理论及立法例在对债务承担进行分类和制度设计时 ,混淆了两类不同的划分标准 ,理论和立法都存在一定的缺陷。本文通过比较分析 ,认为债务承担以第三人承担的量和质为标准 ,综合分为全部承担、部分承担和连带承担 ,并在探讨相关理论基础上提出对《合同法》第 84条的修改建议。
|
| 关 键 词： | 债务承担 全部承担 部分承担 连带承担 制度重构 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-8628(2001)04-07-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001-02-28 |
New Research of Debts Assumption |
| |
| DAI Hong-bin,CHEN Fa-gui. New Research of Debts Assumption[J]. Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2001, 16(4): 7-9 |
| |
| Authors: | DAI Hong-bin CHEN Fa-gui |
| |
| Abstract: | There are some defects in the traditional theories and legislation of classification and systematic design of debt assumption. The thesis thinks that the debt assumption should be standardized with the quantity and quality of third party's debt assumption, classifying as total assumption, partial assumption and implicative assumption.; |
| |
| Keywords: | debt assumption total assumption partial assumption implicative assumption re-construction of system |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
