首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

我国民诉法中发回重审制度的缺陷与立法完善
引用本文:曹吴云,张洪艳,刘雯霞. 我国民诉法中发回重审制度的缺陷与立法完善[J]. 甘肃政法成人教育学院学报, 2003, 0(3): 91-93
作者姓名:曹吴云  张洪艳  刘雯霞
作者单位:中南财经政法大学 湖北武汉430074(曹昊云,张洪艳),中南财经政法大学 湖北武汉430074(刘雯霞)
摘    要:发回重审是上级人民法院处理案件的方式之一,该制度蕴涵了程序保障、权益保护和监督制约等功能。当前,我国民诉法中的发回重审制度存在的弊端已影响其功能的发挥。为完善该制度,一是要建立发回重审与指定改变管辖并存的制度;二是取消“可能影响正确判决、裁定”这一条件,规定只有严重违反诉讼程序的才发回重审;三是取消实体处理有问题可以发回重审这一规定。

关 键 词:发回重审  缺陷  立法完善
文章编号:1009-7759(2003)03-0091-03
修稿时间:2003-03-23

Defects and Legislative Improvement of Remanding for Retrial in Civil Procedure Law
Cao Haoyun,Zhang Hongyan,Liu Wenxia. Defects and Legislative Improvement of Remanding for Retrial in Civil Procedure Law[J]. Journal of Adults Education of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute, 2003, 0(3): 91-93
Authors:Cao Haoyun  Zhang Hongyan  Liu Wenxia
Abstract:Remanding for retrial is a way higher court handles the case, it contains the functions of safeguarding the procedure, protecting the rights, and supervision each other. But the legislative defects affect these functions to play. In order to perfect it, firstly, system of remanding and changing jurisdiction should exist at the same time. Secondly, the condition that probably affects corrective judge and ruling should be cancelled, and only serious violation of legal procedure can be remanded. Thirdly, the stipulation of remanding for the problems of substantive disposition should be cancelled too.
Keywords:remanding for retrial   defects   legislative improvement.  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号