首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

妨害民事诉讼强制措施存废刍议
引用本文:王醒.妨害民事诉讼强制措施存废刍议[J].山西青年管理干部学院学报,2008,21(1):70-73.
作者姓名:王醒
作者单位:苏州大学法学院,江苏,苏州,215006
摘    要:我国民事诉讼法中规定的妨害民事诉讼强制措施,无论是理论基础还是具体适用上都存在一些问题。然而,在学界对其的讨论中,建议改造的多过探讨其存废的。由于该制度本身不可避免的制裁性与民事诉讼中法官的基本职责相矛盾,每个措施实践中又都存在问题,因此,该制度存在的理论基础和实际价值均值得质疑。废除该制度并引入其他替代性制度,是一种有利于加强当事人主体地位并符合我国法治社会建设的较好选择。

关 键 词:妨害民事诉讼强制措施  法律制裁  废除
文章编号:1008-8997(2008)01-0070-04
修稿时间:2007年12月13

Consideration on the Existence and Abolition of the Mandatory Measures for Prejudicing Civil Action
WANG Xing.Consideration on the Existence and Abolition of the Mandatory Measures for Prejudicing Civil Action[J].Journal of Shanxi College For Youth Administrators,2008,21(1):70-73.
Authors:WANG Xing
Institution:WANG Xing (School of Laws, Suzhou University, Suzhou, 215006, China)
Abstract:The mandatory measures for prejudicing civil action, regulated in Chinese Civil Procedure Act, is not perfect both in theoretical basis and in practical application. However, when scholars have academic discussions on the measures, they mainly focused on its revision rather than its existence and abolition. Since there is contradiction between the inevitable sanction of the system and the judges' basic duties undertaken in civil action, and there are always problems in every practice, the theoretical basis and practical value are questionable. Therefore it is necessary to abolish the system and introduce other substitutive systems, which can help to strengthen the parties' subjective position and is suitable to construct the society ruled with laws.
Keywords:mandatory measures for prejudicing civil action  legal sanctions  abolish
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号