首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

《国家赔偿法》第17条第(一)项适用之探讨
引用本文:罗文燕. 《国家赔偿法》第17条第(一)项适用之探讨[J]. 河北法学, 2003, 21(6): 63-65
作者姓名:罗文燕
作者单位:杭州商学院,法学院,浙江,杭州,310012
摘    要:在国家不承担刑事赔偿责任的六种法定情形中,对于《国家赔偿法》第17条第(一)项的理解存在着较大的分歧,导致法律适用不一。以国家赔偿的归责原则为基础,探求刑事诉讼各阶段“公民自己故意作虚伪供述,或者伪造其他有罪证据”与刑事赔偿的关系,进而对《国家赔偿法》第17条第(一)项国家不承担赔偿责任的法定情形提出司法与立法建议。

关 键 词:刑事赔偿  免责  故意  虚伪供述
文章编号:1002-3933(2003)06-0063-03
修稿时间:2003-05-19

Discussion on Some Questions about Application of Article 17(1) of the Law on State Compensation
LUO Wen-yan. Discussion on Some Questions about Application of Article 17(1) of the Law on State Compensation[J]. Hebei Law Science, 2003, 21(6): 63-65
Authors:LUO Wen-yan
Abstract:Pursuant to the Law on State Compensation , the state is exempted from criminal compensation under six categories of statutory circumstances. However, Article 17 (1 ) of this law is quite controversial and gives rise to confusion in terms of application of law. This paper bases on the doctrine of imputation for state compensation, and extrapolates the relationship between"the false confession or evidence of guilty that citizens make intentionally or falsify in various phases of criminal proceedings"and criminal compensation. It ends in formulating legislative and judicial proposals so as to perfect the statutory provisions embodied in Article 17(1) of the Law on State Compensation.
Keywords:criminal compensation  exemption  intent  false confession  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号