首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

民事诉讼上的非法证据排除:理论学说与认定标准
引用本文:毕玉谦*. 民事诉讼上的非法证据排除:理论学说与认定标准[J]. 证据科学, 2012, 0(4): 389-407
作者姓名:毕玉谦*
作者单位:中国政法大学
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目“三大诉讼证据制度基础理论比较研究”(项目批准号为:06BFX053)的阶级性成果
摘    要:民事诉讼中的当事人因系平等的私权主体,在调查收集证据上往往不可能动用强有力的公共资源.除了在证明标准上有较低度的要求以外,为了缓和举证上的压力,有关法律仅在有限范围内采用否定性的表达方式,以尽可能在更为广阔领域范围内承认证据在法律上的合法性,以便尽可能限缩证据排除规则的适用范围.在民事诉讼证据的合法性及其排除规则的应用...

关 键 词:民事诉讼  非法证据排除  理论学说  认定标准

The Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence in Civil Actions : Theories and Identification Standards
Bi Yuqian. The Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence in Civil Actions : Theories and Identification Standards[J]. Evidence Science, 2012, 0(4): 389-407
Authors:Bi Yuqian
Affiliation:Bi Yuqian,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088.
Abstract:The parties in civil lawsuits usually cannot use strong public resources in the investigation and collection of evidences because they are equal subjects of the private rights..In addition to the lower requirement for standard of proof,the relevant laws also adopt the way of negative expression only within the limited range in order to alleviate the pressure on the burden of proof,to trying admitting evidence and limiting the use of exclusionary rule as much as possible.Many theories study the legitimacy of civil procedure evidence and the application of exclusionary rule starting from how to deal with the relationship between procedural law and substantive law.It is important,to balance the legal rights and interests of the person adducing evidence against that of the victim,,and find a balance point between fact-finding and due process.
Keywords:Civil litigation  Exclusion of illegally obtained evidence  Theories  Identification standard
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号