美国的反倾销调查与337条款调查之比较研究

美国是当今世界上贸易救济种类最多、制度构建最为严密、救济力度最大的国家。反倾销调查与337条款调查这两种贸易救济措施在近年来美国的外贸实践中愈发显得引人注目。虽然国内研究美国反倾销调查的相关法律和实践问题的文章、专著可谓是数不胜数,而且随着近两年来中国企业遭受337条款调查的次数逐年增多而引致对337条款调查进行说明或研究的文章也日渐增多,但是包含有将这两种贸易救济措施进行比较研究的文章却寥寥无几且大多只是简短说明或一笔带过。然而这种比较研究不仅能够使我们清晰地认识到二者的主要不同之处,更能够以反倾销调查这种为大家所熟知的救济措施来映衬出337条款调查的相对更强的贸易救济功能。毕竟,只有非常精准地了解337条款调查的方方面面及其强大的贸易救济功能,我们才可能真正地探索出兼具能够切实有效地“防范于未然”和“应对于已然”的种种谋略。

A Comparative Study Between Anti-Dumping investigations and Section 337 Investigations of the United States''''

Nowadays,the United States is the country whose variety of trade remedies is the most in the world.In addition,its construction of related institutions is the most all-sided and the remedial effects are the most striking.Anti-dumping investigations and section 337 investigations are the two trade remedies which are more and more noticeable in foreign trade of the United States in recent years.Although there have been a great number of articles and monographs on the legal and practical aspects of anti-dumping investigations of the United State,furthermore,with the increase of section 337 investigations against Chinese enterprises in the recent two years,articles to explain or explore section 337 investigations are consequently emerging,only a few of them have ever treated of the comparative study on these two trade remedies without exploring it at length.However,this comparative study can not only make us get acquainted the essential distinctions between them,but also can highlight the more powerful remedial effect of section 337 investigations against the well-known anti-dumping investigations.After all,we can feasibly find out various precautionary and remedial strategies only after having precisely explored all the aspects of section 337 investigations and the more powerful remedial effects.