| 地理标志证明商标不应与商品商标进行近似性比对—“恩施玉露ENSHIYULU及图”商标异议复审行政案评析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 周 波. 地理标志证明商标不应与商品商标进行近似性比对—“恩施玉露ENSHIYULU及图”商标异议复审行政案评析[J]. 科技与法律, 2014, 0(2): 340-351 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 周 波 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京市高级人民法院知识产权庭 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 地理标志证明商标与商品商标,在商标标志的构成及商标的功能作用等方面均存在实质性差异,因此,在适用《商标法》第28条对相关商标是否构成使用在相同或类似商品上的近似商标进行判断时,不应将地理标志证明商标与商品商标进行近似性比对。
|
| 关 键 词： | 地理标志 证明商标 商品商标 商标近似 |
Geographical Indications Registered as Certification Marks Should Not be Compared with Trademarks in Similarity |
| |
| ZHOU Bo. Geographical Indications Registered as Certification Marks Should Not be Compared with Trademarks in Similarity[J]. Science Technology and Law, 2014, 0(2): 340-351 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHOU Bo |
| |
| Abstract: | Geographical indications registered as certification marks are different from trademarks in the composition and the functions of the marks. Applying Article 28 of Trademark Law of the People＇s Republic of China to decide whether the relevant marks are identical or similar used on identical or similar goods, geographical indications registered as or applying for the registration as certification marks should not be compared with trademarks in similarity. |
| |
| Keywords: | Geographical Indications Certification Marks Trademarks Similarity. |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
