首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

也论推定规则适用中的证明责任和证明标准——兼与何家弘教授商榷
引用本文:刘英明. 也论推定规则适用中的证明责任和证明标准——兼与何家弘教授商榷[J]. 证据科学, 2009, 17(5): 608-619
作者姓名:刘英明
作者单位:上海政法学院
摘    要:中国现行法不仅存在转移“完整证明责任”的推定规则,也存在类似于美国法上仅转移“举证责任”的推定规则。在中国,对推定事实进行有效反驳的证明标准不应该是统一的“优势证据”标准,而应该根据诉讼类型、推定类型不同而有所区分。

关 键 词:证明责任  证明标准  推定

A further research on burden of proof and standard of proof in applying the presumption rules-A discussion with Professsor He Jiahong
Liu Yingming. A further research on burden of proof and standard of proof in applying the presumption rules-A discussion with Professsor He Jiahong[J]. Evidence Science, 2009, 17(5): 608-619
Authors:Liu Yingming
Affiliation:Liu Yingming. (Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, 201701)
Abstract:In the positive law of China, there exist not only presumption rules that transfer "full burden of proof, but also those that transfer "partial burden of proof", which are similar to the presumption rules that only transfer the burden of production in USA. In China, the standard of proof for effectively refuting presumed facts should not be subject to the "preponderance of evidence" standard, but instead should be diversified according to the type of litigation and type of presumption.
Keywords:Burden of proof   Standard of proof   Presumption
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号