首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

规范性文件的法律效力问题研究
引用本文:林庆伟,沈少阳. 规范性文件的法律效力问题研究[J]. 行政法学研究, 2004, 0(3): 44-51
作者姓名:林庆伟  沈少阳
作者单位:华东政法学院,上海,200042
摘    要:我国有关法律将规范性文件与行政法规、规章相区别 ,将前者不作为法律规范看待 ,但又未提出区分二者的明确标准。事实上 ,行政法规、规章与创制性规范性文件的内容、规范效果及制定程序界限模糊 ,规范性文件还往往是法院在行政诉讼中的审查基准。从德、日、美等国的有关制度可以看出 ,法律规范与非法律规范的界限是是否规定公民的权利义务 ,是否具有外部规范性。就此而言 ,我国的创制性规范性文件是法律规范

关 键 词:规范性文件  创制性规范性文件  外部规范性  法律效力

On Issue of Legal Force of Regulatory Documents
LIN Qing-wei,SHEN Shao-yang. On Issue of Legal Force of Regulatory Documents[J]. Administrative Law Review, 2004, 0(3): 44-51
Authors:LIN Qing-wei  SHEN Shao-yang
Abstract:Regulatory documents, which are not regarded as legal norms, are different from administrative rules and regulation in our legal system. However, there is no clear standard to differentiate regulatory documents from the latter ones. In fact, the dividing line of contents, legal force and procedure for formulation between administrative rules, regulation and creatively regulatory documents is unclear. In Germany, Japan and the United States, the distinction between legal norms and non-legal norms is whether they have outer normative effect and whether they prescribe civil rights and obligations. In conclusion, creatively regulatory documents are legal norms in China.
Keywords:Regulatory Documents  Creatively Regulatory Documents  Outer Normative Effect  Legal Force
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号