首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中美未决羁押审查程序比较研究
引用本文:叶雨晴.中美未决羁押审查程序比较研究[J].山西省政法管理干部学院学报,2012,25(1):27-29.
作者姓名:叶雨晴
作者单位:安徽大学法学院,安徽合肥,230601
摘    要:我国未决羁押采取行政化的审查方式加之缺乏其他的配套制度,导致司法实践中侵犯犯罪嫌疑人、被告人合法权利的现象时有发生。完善我国未决羁押审查程序,应首先将羁押同拘留、逮捕分离,引入羁押听证程序,并赋予犯罪嫌疑人、被告人不服听证结果的上诉权、申诉权和定期申请审查权。

关 键 词:未决羁押  审查程序  逮捕前置  羁押听证  司法救济

Comparative Study on Review Procedures of Custody Pending between China and America
YE Yu-qing.Comparative Study on Review Procedures of Custody Pending between China and America[J].Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators,2012,25(1):27-29.
Authors:YE Yu-qing
Institution:YE Yu-qing(Law School of Anhui University,Hefei Anhui 230601,China)
Abstract:Custody pending of our country takes the way of administrative review and lacks of other supporting systems,so the legal rights of criminal suspects and defendants are often violated in judicial practice.In order to improve the review procedures of custody pending of our country,we should firstly separate custody from detention and arrest,and then introduce custody hearing procedures.We also should give the right of appeal,the right to appeal and the right to apply for review on a regular basis for the criminal suspects and defendants if they refuse to accept the result of hearing.
Keywords:custody pending  review procedure  pre-arrest  custody hearing  judicial remedies
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号