首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论欧洲人权法院的非法证据排除
引用本文:刘国庆,汪枫. 论欧洲人权法院的非法证据排除[J]. 铁道警官高等专科学校学报, 2013, 23(4): 64-70
作者姓名:刘国庆  汪枫
作者单位:北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京,100875
摘    要:欧洲人权法院对于非法证据的处理与英美法系国家迥然不同。欧洲人权法院并没有就如何排除非法证据制定系列指导性的纲要,而是采取个案中具体考量的办法,重点考察公权力人员的非法取证行为是否给整个诉讼程序造成不公,以及获取证据与案件关联性的有无及强弱,在此基础上决定证据排除与否。

关 键 词:关联性  可采性  非法证据  衍生证据  隐私权

On the Exclusion of Illegal Evidence of European Court of Human Rights
Liu Guoqing , Wang Feng. On the Exclusion of Illegal Evidence of European Court of Human Rights[J]. Journal of Railway Ministry Zhengzhou Police College, 2013, 23(4): 64-70
Authors:Liu Guoqing    Wang Feng
Affiliation:Liu Guoqing & Wang Feng (College for Criminal Law Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
Abstract:European Court of Human Rights has its own characteristics as for the treatment of illegal evidence, which is different from Anglo - American countries. European Court of Human Rights doesn' t make a series of guiding outlines with reference to the exclusion of the evidence obtained illegally ; however, it adopts an approach of considering case-by-case, which attaches much importance to the two key factors: the fairness of procedure as a whole and the relevance of evidence. On the basis of that, the judges are determined whether the evidence obtained illegally are excluded or not.
Keywords:relevance  admissibility of evidence  illegal evidence  derivative evidence  the right of privacy
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号