Pluralism,corporatism and perception of corruption |
| |
Authors: | Direnç Kanol |
| |
Institution: | CIRCaP, University of Siena, Siena, Italy |
| |
Abstract: | When people know who is influencing the elected politicians and they may ‘put the rascals out’ in case they feel that the incumbents are corrupt, ceteris paribus, their perception of the level of corruption should not be affected by lobbying. If on the other hand people are not sure which or how many actors are influencing public policy and they are not able to hold the government truly accountable as interest group influence is constant with different governments, people will be more likely to perceive the government as corrupted. The former system is a characteristic of corporatism and the latter of pluralism. This problem is exacerbated by the fact that interest groups with resources such as business groups or firms in pluralist systems are more influential than groups with few resources. Thus, people may perceive pluralist policy‐making system as more corrupt than corporatist policy‐making system where fewer visible actors have more or less equal weight in the policy‐making process. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
Keywords: | Perception of Corruption Lobbying Corporatism Pluralism Clarity of Responsibility Interest Groups |
|
|