| 论理性主义的双重角色 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 唐小松,唐平.论理性主义的双重角色[J].东南亚研究,2005(5):57-60. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 唐小松 唐平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广东外语外贸大学外交系,广东,广州,510420 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从国际关系理论和思想史的发展来看,有多重涵义的理性主义主要在思想传统和研究范式两方面中扮演不同的角色.本文从这两个角度出发,分析了作为思想传统和作为研究范式的理性主义各自不同的提出背景、内涵、特点、地位与影响等,并从继承和异化的两方面来对二者进行了初步比较.
|
| 关 键 词： | 理性主义 双重角色 思想传统 研究范式 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-6099(2005)05-0057-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年9月20日 |
Double Roles of Rationalism |
| |
| Tang Xiaosong,Tang Ping.Double Roles of Rationalism[J].Southeast Asian Studies,2005(5):57-60. |
| |
| Authors: | Tang Xiaosong Tang Ping |
| |
| Abstract: | In the development of theoretical and idealistic history of international relations, rationalism, which has various connotations, mainly plays different roles in the aspects of idealistic tradition and study paradigm. From these two perspectives, this article analyzes the different kinds of rationalism, which respectively serve as idealistic tradition and study paradigm, and their relations are also embodied in the comparison of the two facets of succession and dissimilation. |
| |
| Keywords: | rationalism double roles idealistic tradition study paradigm |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
