| 试论责令性行政行为的司法认定 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 巢永乐. 试论责令性行政行为的司法认定[J]. 行政与法, 2020, 0(5): 90-98 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 巢永乐 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中南财经政法大学法学院 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社科基金一般项目“国家监察机关行政问责的体系化研究”的阶段性成果,项目编号:19BFX051;中南财经政法大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助“央地关系下粤港澳大湾区的立法保障”的阶段性成果,项目编号:201910637。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 因责令性行政行为的法律属性存在争议,亦使法院在司法实践中的审判思路不尽相同,导致裁判结果不一,这也是此类案件频繁进入二审、再审的重要原因。本文认为,法院在认定时应以现行法律规范为基础进行体系化解释,关注责令性行政行为所产生的实质效果并结合具体因素进行分析,以更好地辨析其法律属性,从而有效发挥法院定分止争的功能。
|
| 关 键 词： | 司法认定 责令改正 行政处罚 行政命令 |
On the Judicial Cognizance of Ordering Administrative Act |
| |
| Chao Yongle. On the Judicial Cognizance of Ordering Administrative Act[J]. Public Administration & Law, 2020, 0(5): 90-98 |
| |
| Authors: | Chao Yongle |
| |
| Abstract: | In the face of the dispute over the legal attribute of the administrative act of ordering,the court mainly adopts four different trial ideas in its determination,which leads to the instability of the judgment result,which is the important reason why such cases frequently enter the second instance and retrial.Therefore,the court should make a systematic interpretation on the basis of the current legal norms,pay attention to the substantive effect of the administrative act of ordering and analyze it in combination with the specific factors in practice,so as to better distinguish its legal attributes and effectively play the function of court to determine disputes. |
| |
| Keywords: | judicial determination order for correction administrative punishment administrative order |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
