首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

非婚生育社会抚养费征收范围之界定
引用本文:经亚龙,江利红.非婚生育社会抚养费征收范围之界定[J].行政与法,2020(5):108-120.
作者姓名:经亚龙  江利红
作者单位:华东政法大学法律学院
基金项目:国家社科基金一般项目“‘放管服’改革背景下行政收费设定范围研究”的阶段性成果,项目编号:19BFX059。
摘    要:实践中对于非婚生育是否应当征收社会抚养费存在争议,而争议的背后是社会伦理道德、规范解读和理论适用等多方面因素共同作用的结果。非婚生育社会抚养费在行政收费原理下应围绕国家主体以概括量化的数字形式确定范围,避免婚姻状态对费用征收范围界定产生的影响。同时,在规范视角下,法律规定的“国家提倡一对夫妻生育两个子女”属于强制性义务,但不宜解读为禁止非婚生育行为。婚生与非婚生育本质上同属于生育行为,在同一体系内应当保证费用征收的同一性。因此,必须基于理论和规范的分析,方可界定非婚生育社会抚养费征收范围。

关 键 词:非婚生育  社会抚养费  行政收费

On the Definition of the Scope of Social Support Fee Collection for Non Marital Childbearing
Jiang Lihong.On the Definition of the Scope of Social Support Fee Collection for Non Marital Childbearing[J].Public Administration & Law,2020(5):108-120.
Authors:Jiang Lihong
Abstract:In practice,there is a dispute about whether the social maintenance fee should be levied for the illegitimate childbearing.Behind the dispute,there are many factors such as social ethics,normative interpretation and theoretical application.Under the principle of administrative charge,the social support fee for non marital childbearing should be determined in the form of generalized and quantitative figures around the main body of the state,so as to avoid the influence of marital status on the definition of the scope of charge collection.At the same time,from the perspective of norms,it is compulsory for the state to advocate one couple to have two children,but it should not be interpreted as prohibiting non marital childbearing.In essence,marriage and illegitimacy belong to the same behavior of childbearing,and the identity of fee collection should be guaranteed in the same system.Therefore,it is necessary to define the scope of social maintenance fee collection for non marital childbearing based on the theoretical and normative analysis.
Keywords:illegitimate childbearing  social support fees  collection scope  administrative fees
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号