| 动物法律地位刍议——私法视野下的分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 崔拴林. 动物法律地位刍议——私法视野下的分析[J]. 河北法学, 2008, 26(3): 96-100 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 崔拴林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京师范大学法学院,江苏,南京,210046 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在动物法律地位问题上,存在"肯定论"和"否定论"两种观点。"肯定论"的观点在认识论上忽视了动物不可能具有道德判断能力的事实,在本体论上曲解了法律主体据以享有权利的"内在价值"的含义,在私法理论上带来一系列的难题,在法律制度上缺乏可操作性,故不足取。"否定论"中的"义务论"观点则认为,需要人类保护的动物乃是人类的保护义务的客体。"义务论"既可以达到"肯定论"拟保护动物的目的,又完全不与现有的法律理论和制度相冲突,还具有可操作性,所以是解决动物法律地位问题的最佳方案。
|
| 关 键 词： | 动物法律地位 肯定论 义务论 主体 客体 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-3933(2008)03-0096-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-07-12 |
On the Legal Status of Animals: An Analysis from the Private Law Perspective |
| |
| CUI Shuan-lin. On the Legal Status of Animals: An Analysis from the Private Law Perspective[J]. Hebei Law Science, 2008, 26(3): 96-100 |
| |
| Authors: | CUI Shuan-lin |
| |
| Abstract: | On the issue of the legal status of animals,there are both Positive and Negative viewpoints.The Positive argument is not advisable as in epistemology it neglects the fact that animals can never have moral judgment competence,in ontology it distorts the meaning of the Internal Value by which legal subjects enjoy rights,and in legal system it lacks practicability.The Obligatory theory of the Negative argument is the best solution to the issue of animals' legal status as it can satisfy the purpose of protecting animals intended by the Positive argument,does not have any conflict with prevailing legal theories and systems,and is operational as well. |
| |
| Keywords: | the legal status of animals the positive argument the obligatory theory subjects objects |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
