首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

误收假币后故意使用行为的刑事责任问题初探
引用本文:张光君,杨平. 误收假币后故意使用行为的刑事责任问题初探[J]. 湖北警官学院学报, 2009, 22(5): 16-20
作者姓名:张光君  杨平
作者单位:西南政法大学应用法学院,重庆,401120;重庆市江北区人民检察院,重庆,400025
摘    要:误收假币后故意使用的行为具有刑事可罚性,应当以使用假币罪定罪处刑。在犯罪认定时,客观要件之中的“使用”行为不应以置于流通为必要;只要能够根据基础事实予以合理推定其主观上为“明知”,就足以认定其符合本罪的主观要件。由于该行为的期待可能性较小,因此处刑时应结合我国针对误收假币后故意使用行为的立法变动情况,对于数额较大的情形原则上只判处罚金刑,而是否侵犯公私财产权这一随机客体也具有影响量刑的功能。

关 键 词:使用假币罪  犯罪行为  刑事责任  随机客体

On Criminal Liability of Intentionally Using Counterfeit Money Received Mistakenly
Zhang Guangjun,Yang Ping. On Criminal Liability of Intentionally Using Counterfeit Money Received Mistakenly[J]. JOurnal of Hubei University of Police, 2009, 22(5): 16-20
Authors:Zhang Guangjun  Yang Ping
Affiliation:1.Southwest University of Political Science & Law, Chongqing 401120, China; 2. Jiangbei District People's Procuratorate, Chongqing City, Chongqing 400025, China)
Abstract:The act of intentionally using counterfeit money mistakenly received has criminal punishment,and should be convicted of using of counterfeit money.In determination of crime,the behavior of use in objective circumstances should not be placed in circulation as necessary.As long as the actor's subjective aspect could be deduced as knowing legitimately,it is enough to identify with all the subjective elements of this crime.Because of the smaller probability of anticipation,sen-tence for the act should be combined with our legislative changes in the crime of using counterfeit money mistakenly re-ceived.The case for a larger amount of counterfeit money should be only sentenced penalty in principle,and the random object whether public and private property rights was violated has function on sentencing.
Keywords:crime of using counterfeit money  criminal behavior  criminal responsibility  random object
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号