论刑事和解中的证明责任和证明标准

刑事和解与刑事审判程序不同，它更加重视当事人双方自由选择的意愿，不能忽视证明责任和证明标准这两个证据法中的基本问题。在实践占主导地位的司法调解模式下的刑事和解作为审判前程序．由检察机关主持，包含加害方自愿认罪和双方达成赔偿协议两个阶段，蕴含着刑事和民事两种不同的证明对象、证明责任和证明标准。应当参照刑事诉讼和民事诉讼的规则．明确刑事和解程序中的证明责任主体、分配规则以及不同阶段的证明标准，这有利于刑事和解顺利开展，达到案结事了。

On Burden of Proof and Standard of Proof in Criminal Reconciliation

CCriminal reconciliation is different from trial procedure. It puts more emphasis on the
‘will of free choice＇ of the two parties. However,we should not ignore the two basic issues that are the‘burden of proof＇ and the‘standard of proof＇. As part of the pretrial proceedings, criminal reconciliation, a leading model of judicial mediation in practice, has two phases--the confession and the compensation agreement. It is led by the prosecutorial agency. There are two kind of the-‘objects of proof＇, ‘burden of proof＇ and‘standard of proof＇ in criminal proceedings and civil proceedings respectively.. It is necessary to apply the rules of criminal procedure and civil procedure respectively and distinguish the subject of proof, the rules allocation and the standard of proof in the various stages. This facili- tates criminal reconciliation and achieves a ＂case closed with matter resolved＂.