| 效率违约悖论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈凌云. 效率违约悖论[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2009, 0(1) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈凌云 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 吉林大学法学院,长春,130012 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 效率违约是经济分析法学派的经典理论之一。其核心思想是,如果履行成本大于因违约所应支付的损害赔偿金,那么违约就是有效率的。其将合同法从惩恶扬善的工具变成了合理划分商业风险的法律手段。此理论一度为美国司法实务界所崇尚。然效率违约并非真效率,这种理论只有在满足绝对条件情况下才能实现,但是无论从效率违约的前提假设基础,还是从合同法本身的制度设计而言,效率违约非效率,实乃悖论。
|
| 关 键 词： | 效率违约 效率 违约救济 |
The Efficient Breach Fallacy |
| |
| GHEN Ling-yun. The Efficient Breach Fallacy[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2009, 0(1) |
| |
| Authors: | GHEN Ling-yun |
| |
| Affiliation: | GHEN Ling-yun; |
| |
| Abstract: | The Efficient Breach is the classic theory of Chicago. The key thought is that if the performing cost is larger than the damages paid for breach of contract, breach of contract is Efficient. The Contract Law is changed from the instrument of punishing guilty and support goodness into the way of reasonably allocating commercial risks. And it is appreciated by the American jurisdiction. However efficient breach does not mean efficient, and it would be realized when meeting the Absolute conditions, but it is a... |
| |
| Keywords: | the efficient breach efficiency the relief for the breach of contract |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
