首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

索绪尔符号观再评价
引用本文:卢德平. 索绪尔符号观再评价[J]. 中国青年政治学院学报, 2001, 20(2): 101-108
作者姓名:卢德平
作者单位:中国青年政治学院,文化基础部,北京,100089
摘    要:语言符号的任意性是贯穿索绪尔语言符号学思想的一条重要原则.任意性理论的提出,并不纯粹是索绪尔本人对符号本质问题深刻反思的结果,而很大程度上得益于对其他许多非语言符号的比较.这是划分两类不同符号系统的一条重要标准.但是,索绪尔过分强调能指的形式侧面在符号结合体中的作用,相反对待号的能指侧面在物质质料构成上的特征,以及这些特征如何有助于区别开不同的符号体系这一问题,却注意不够.符号的解释主体对符号形态的认同,除了符号的所指功能外,实际上对符号的能指侧面的物质质料特征有着很大程度的偏重.这也是符号学的代码理论所要研究的重大问题.

关 键 词:索绪尔  语言符号的本质  语言符号与非语言符号
文章编号:1002-8919(2001)02-0101-08
修稿时间:2000-10-19

Reflection on Saussure's Semiotic Theory
LU De-ping. Reflection on Saussure's Semiotic Theory[J]. Journal of China Youth College for Political Sciences, 2001, 20(2): 101-108
Authors:LU De-ping
Abstract:The arbitrariness of linguistic signs can be considered as the most important principle in saussurean semiotic theory. Such a theoretical principle does not only come from his keen reflection on the nature of linguistic signs,but also as a result from his comparison between linguistic signs and other non-verbal signs. Since saussure concentrates so much on the role significant form plays in the dual combination of sign units; he overlooked the material character of significant side of linguistic signs. A semiotic subject's identification with the semiotic typology of signs, in fact, highly depends on the material character a particular sign may possess at its significant level. This is also an important problem for the code theory of semiotics.
Keywords:Saussure  nature of linguistic signs  linguistic signs and non-verbal signs  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号