| 犯罪化范围的法理分析与展开 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 蔡一军. 犯罪化范围的法理分析与展开[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2010, 0(1) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 蔡一军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海政法学院刑事司法系; |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家留学基金委“建设高水平大学项目”(2007); 上海市教育高地项目“刑罚分权的基本理路”基金资助项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在犯罪化的合法性范围问题上,出现理论争议主要是由于对刑法所设立的禁止性义务来源的认识不同,其争论焦点在于刑法是否或应在多大程度上强制推行某种意义上的社会共同体道德。法律道德主义与法律自由主义在理论的实际应用上因其不确定性而往往难以统摄形形色色的社会现象。效益评价理论会因其伦理根基的不足而无法对自身理论进行有效的修正。实际上,犯罪化的范围是由刑法的价值本位决定的,应是界于个人本位与社会本位之间的一种动态定位,因而犯罪化的合法性范围的实然确定是立法者在协调社会本位与个人本位的基础上,依据某一阶段刑事政策的需要而对越轨行为做出的动态反应。
|
| 关 键 词： | 犯罪化 合法性 效益评价 刑事政策 |
Jurisprudential Analysis on the Scope of Criminalization |
| |
| CAI Yi-jun. Jurisprudential Analysis on the Scope of Criminalization[J]. Law and Social Development, 2010, 0(1) |
| |
| Authors: | CAI Yi-jun |
| |
| Affiliation: | CAI Yi-jun(Department of Criminal Justice,Shanghai University of Political Science , Law,Shanghai,201701) |
| |
| Abstract: | Controversial issue in the legality scope of criminalization is mainly focused on the resource of prohibit duties built by criminal law, namely, whether and how criminal law should advance the morality of social community. Legal moralists and legal liberalists cannot cover all social phenomena due to the uncertainty of practical application of the theories. The theory of performance assessment cannot effectively modify itself due to its insufficient of ethical basis. In essence, the scope of criminalization... |
| |
| Keywords: | criminalization legality performance assessment criminal policy |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
