关于抢劫罪“致人死亡”的三重解释

抢劫致人死亡的,行为人是否可以对死亡后果持故意的心理态度,是中外刑法学界颇有争议的问题。在坚持结果加重犯的加重结果的主观罪过仅限于过失的立场下,通过尝试运用比较解释、体系解释和目的解释这三种方法对相关刑法条文进行不同维度的解释,得出的结论是我国刑法分则中的“致人死亡”一词的一般含义是过失致人死亡,抢劫作为一种侵犯财产犯罪,不应也不能包括故意杀人的行为。因此,最高人民法院关于抢劫杀人案件的司法解释值得商榷。

Three Explanations for Robbery to Death

Robbery to the death of people, the perpetrator can hold on to the consequences of deliberate psychological attitude, Chinese and foreign scholars Penal Code is quite controversial. Aggravation of adhering to add to the results of the subjective sin limited to the fault position, by trying to use more explanation system explanation and purpose of these three methods to explain the relevant provisions in the Criminal Law of different dimensions of the interpretation, the conclusion is China's Criminal Law is the "cause death" in the meaning of justice is not ah fault caused the death of people, robbery as a violation of property crime, TU can not and must not include the acts of intentional homicide. Therefore, the Supreme People's Court on robbery and murder of judicial interpretation is open to question.