从积极到消极的实质真实发现主义

我国刑事诉讼实行以务必发现事实真相为基本主张的实质(客观)真实发现主义,近年来此一主义受到挑战。本文比较了实质真实发现主义与形式真实发现主义、积极的实质真实发现主义与消极的实质真实发现主义的差异,分析了实质真实发现主义与诉讼类型、诉讼模式的关系,指出实质真实发现主义是职权主义刑事诉讼的构成要素,它与职权主义有着共同的理性主义的认识论基础。作者反对在刑事诉讼中弃置实质真实发现主义,同时主张将我国实际实行的积极的实质真实发现主义转移为消极的实质真实发现主义,将审判活动的重心转移到防止给无辜者定罪上来。

From Positive to Negative Doctrine of Real Truth Discovering

Summary To find out substantial truth is a fundamental principle and be carried out in criminal procedure of China.It is challenged now by several scholars that it is necessary and possible to find out substantial troth.This dissertation compares substantial truthism and formal truthism,positive substantial truthism and passive substantial truthism,analyses the relation between substantial truthism and procedural styles, procedural models.Substantial truthism is a important factor of litigation system,and have the same base of rationalism as litigation system.The author do not support the viewpoint of being to give up substantial truthism and assert to shift positive substantial tmthism to passive substantial 1 truthism in order to avoid convicting innocent persons.