首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

司法决策如何进行后果考量
引用本文:陈洪杰. 司法决策如何进行后果考量[J]. 财经法学, 2021, 0(2): 150-160
作者姓名:陈洪杰
作者单位:南京大学法学院
基金项目:2018年国家社科基金重点项目“重大改革于法有据的理论与实践研究”(18AFX001)的阶段性成果。
摘    要:主张司法决策应当进行必要的后果考量是当前颇有影响力的一种法律思维方式,从个案裁判法律效果与社会效果相统一的目的论来看,"后果主义"似乎是一种更容易在后果意义上证明为正当的方法论思维。然而,从决策的角度来看,既然决策者需要在各种可能的后果之中去追求最可欲的后果,就必然意味着对某种特定后果进行工具性控制的决策逻辑和权力支配...

关 键 词:后果主义  向上负责  权力独白  交往视角

How to Consider the Consequences in the Judicial Decision-making Process
Chen Hongjie. How to Consider the Consequences in the Judicial Decision-making Process[J]. Law and Economy, 2021, 0(2): 150-160
Authors:Chen Hongjie
Abstract:At present,an influential way of legal thinking is to advocate that judicial decision-making should take necessary consequences into consideration.From the teleological logic of unifying the legal effect and social effect of case judgment,the methodological thinking of consequentialism seems more likely to be justified in the sense of consequence.However,from the perspective of decision-making,since the decision-maker needs to pursue the most desirable consequence among various possible consequences,it inevitably means the decision-making logic and power control chain of instrumental control over a specific consequence.This is why our courts often equate the implementation of“top-down”public policies with the pursuit of social effects of adjudication.The practice of Li Chang-kui case shows that the consequentialism which pursues desirable results in the way of power monologue can hardly win the social recognition without the methodological endorsement of credible process.This may be the advantage of the jury system in emphasizing separation of powers and checks and balances.
Keywords:consequentialism  upward responsibility  power monologue  communication perspective
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号