| 行政诉讼第三人类型化研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴晓华,张海燕. 行政诉讼第三人类型化研究[J]. 贵州警官职业学院学报, 2005, 17(1): 48-51 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴晓华 张海燕 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 苏州大学,法学院,江苏,苏州,215006;苏州大学,法学院,江苏,苏州,215006 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 第三人制度是行政诉讼中的重要制度。由于相关法律规定过于原则模糊,实践中存在的大量第三人缺乏理论的归类,导致了对第三人的研究也浮于表面。对第三人的类型化研究应该建立在第三人范围相对确定的前提上。据此确定行政诉讼第三人资格后,可以围绕第三人制度的目标功能,对第三人类型化。诉讼第三人的分类应采取利害关系和诉讼地位的二元标准,分为独立第三人、准独立第三人和事实关系第三人。
|
| 关 键 词： | 行政诉讼 行政诉讼第三人 确定标准 行政诉讼第三人类型化 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-5195(2005)01-0048-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-11-04 |
A Research on Third Party Assorting in Administrative Litigation |
| |
| WU Xiao-hua,ZHANG Hai-yan. A Research on Third Party Assorting in Administrative Litigation[J]. Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College, 2005, 17(1): 48-51 |
| |
| Authors: | WU Xiao-hua ZHANG Hai-yan |
| |
| Abstract: | The system of the third party is important in administrative litigation. The validation of the third party should depend on both essential criteria and procedure criteria. Based on the validation and guided by the aim of the third party system,we should assort them into three categories with the criteria of two levels. They are independent third party, quasi-independent third party and factual third party. |
| |
| Keywords: | administrative litigation the third party of administrative litigation determination criteria third party assorting in administive litigation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
