首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论司法对体育行会内部纠纷的干预
引用本文:郭树理.论司法对体育行会内部纠纷的干预[J].北京政法职业学院学报,2003(3):26-30.
作者姓名:郭树理
作者单位:湘潭大学法学院讲师,法学博士
基金项目:湖南省教育厅科研项目“体育纠纷的法律救济机制研究”(项目编号 :0 2 C6 18)的阶段性成果
摘    要:足球俱乐部不服从中国足协的纪律处罚,应当可以提起行政诉讼。从司法干预与体育行业自治的关系来看,以诉讼来解决体育行会的内部纠纷,并不会影响体育行会的行业自治。但司法干预应当受到以下原则的限制:技术事项例外原则、用尽内部救济原则与仲裁协议效力优先原则。

关 键 词:体育行会  司法体制  体育自治  行政诉讼  仲裁制度  救济原则  仲裁协议  处罚行为  司法干预  纠纷处理权

On Judicial Interventions in the Internal Disputes of Sports Circles
Guo Shuli.On Judicial Interventions in the Internal Disputes of Sports Circles[J].bejing college of political science and law journal,2003(3):26-30.
Authors:Guo Shuli
Abstract:Football clubs can bring administrative litigation against China Football Association if they do not submit to the latter's disciplinary sanctions. To settle sports disputes between clubs and associations by way of litigation will not hinder the autonomy of sports affairs in the perspective of the relationship between judicial interventions and sports self-governance. However, judicial interventions should be limited by such principles as the exemption of technical matters, the exhaustion of internal remedies and the priority of the effect of arbitration agreement.
Keywords:judicial intervention  sports autonomy  administrative litigation arbitration
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号