首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

具体举证责任视角下举证妨碍理论与制度的重构
引用本文:胡学军. 具体举证责任视角下举证妨碍理论与制度的重构[J]. 证据科学, 2013, 0(6): 659-675
作者姓名:胡学军
作者单位:南昌大学法学院
基金项目:江西省“十二五”社会科学规划课题“司法改革背景下的民事证据制度研究”(11FX06)的阶段性研究成果.本文主体部分作为参赛论文在中国政法大学证据科学研究院承办的“2012年证据科学全国博士生学术论坛”上获得多位师友指点,论文写作过程中部分日语资料的提供与翻译获得清华大学2011级博士留学生小林正弘的帮助,在此一并致谢!一如成例,文责自负.
摘    要:举证妨碍理论的产生与现代证明责任理论具有密切的亲缘关系,而在晚近兴起的“具体举证责任’’理论视野之下,这一概念与制度也将悄然重构。举证妨碍概念在不同的理论背号下的界定或建构是有区别的,在具体举证责任理论下举证妨碍的行为主体、针对对象及行为方式均与传统界定有别。举证妨碍的多元理论基础之间存在逻辑层次关系,相应的救济效果也需体系化重构。举证妨碍作为法解释学上的一个概念不仅也不应囿于实定法上的明确规范。

关 键 词:举证妨碍  重构  证明责任  具体举证责任

On the Reconstruction of the Theory and System concerning the Spoliation of Evidence under the Perspective of the Concrete Burden of Proof.
Hu Xuejun. On the Reconstruction of the Theory and System concerning the Spoliation of Evidence under the Perspective of the Concrete Burden of Proof.[J]. Evidence Science, 2013, 0(6): 659-675
Authors:Hu Xuejun
Affiliation:Hu Xuejun. Law School of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330031.
Abstract:The generation of the theory of the spoliation of evidence and the modem burden of proof theory have a close relationship. Under the theoretical vision of"the concrete burden of proof",the concept and the system will also be gradually reconstructed. Under different theoretical context, the definition or construction of the concept is different. In the context of the theory of the concrete burden of proof, the subjects, objects and behavior of the spoliation of evidence are different from the traditional definitions. There are logical hierarchical relationships between multiple theoretical basis of the spoliation of evidence, and the corresponding remedy effects also need systematic reconstruction. The spoliation of evidence as a concept in the law hermeneutics should not be confined to the clear specification of the positive law.
Keywords:Spoliation of evidence   Reconstruction   The burden of proof   The concrete burden of proof
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号