首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

能动司法:反思与超越
引用本文:陈锐. 能动司法:反思与超越[J]. 浙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2011, 1(3): 12-17
作者姓名:陈锐
作者单位:西南政法大学,行政法学院,重庆,400031
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目《法律方法上的西方经验与本土资源》(09XJA820011)阶段性研究成果之一
摘    要:主持人:何勤华(华东政法大学校长、教授、博士生导师) 当一个热点问题处在热炒之中或之后,一个严肃的学者既不应当盲目地追捧,也不应当随意地否定,他最需要做的也许是客观地对待,冷静地反思,并在反思中实现超越。以下四位法学博士正是基于这种学术态度和追求,对于“能动司法”这个当下中国的热点问题进行了深入而独到的研讨。

关 键 词:能动司法  反思  博士生导师  大学校长  学术态度  法学博士  何勤华  主持人

Judicature Active:a Western Experience,or a Native Resource
CHEN Rui. Judicature Active:a Western Experience,or a Native Resource[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University, 2011, 1(3): 12-17
Authors:CHEN Rui
Affiliation:southwest University of Political Science and Law
Abstract:Judicature active is not a transplant of American “Judicial activism”, but a result that have synthesized and absorbed both western judicial experience and Chinese excellent judicial tradition. We can find a lot of things in it, such as the influence of “judicial activism”, the spirit of American pragmatism, the Marxism judicial ideas and the virtues of Chinese traditional judiciary practice. But judicature active is only adding of them, there are a lot of innovations in it, so I think that have experienced a process of inheritance, synthesis and development. After that process, It has become a kind of judicial idea with Chinese socialism characteristics.
Keywords:judicature active  Judicial activism  pragmatism judicial philosophy
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《浙江省政法管理干部学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《浙江省政法管理干部学院学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号