首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

当代侵权法比较研究
引用本文:格哈特·瓦格纳,高圣平,熊丙万.当代侵权法比较研究[J].法学家,2010(2).
作者姓名:格哈特·瓦格纳  高圣平  熊丙万
作者单位:德国波恩大学法学院;中国人民大学法学院;
摘    要:侵权法在两大法系中所采路径截然不同、风格各异,这一特点与具体规则模式和一般原则模式之间的现代法律理论的区别是相伴而生的。比较侵权法的焦点主要不是实体问题,而是侵权法的基本结构和模式问题。在侵权法的诸多具体制度上,两大法系远比普遍认为的那样更为相近,二者之间并没有不可逾越的障碍和差别。

关 键 词:一般条款VS类型化  保护范围  过错责任  严格责任  侵权法与保险  

Comparative Tort Law
Gerhard Wagner,Professor of Bonn University Law School,Professorship for German , European Private , Procedure Law,International Private Law , Comparative Law at Bonn University in Germany..Comparative Tort Law[J].Jurists Review,2010(2).
Authors:Gerhard Wagner  Professor of Bonn University Law School  Professorship for German  European Private  Procedure Law  International Private Law  Comparative Law at Bonn University in Germany
Institution:Gerhard Wagner,Professor of Bonn University Law School,Professorship for German and European Private and Procedure Law,International Private Law and Comparative Law at Bonn University in Germany.
Abstract:The two contrasting approaches of tort law,in civil law tradition and common law tradition,parallel the distinction in modern legal theory between rule-based and principle-based models of law.The focus of interest is not on substantive issues,but rather on the basic structure and style of tort law.The Continental law of delict and English tort law are really much closer together than is commonly thought;there is no question of unbridgeable gaps and differences.
Keywords:General Clause Versus Variety of Individual Torts  Scope of Protection  Liability for Fault  Strict Liability  Tort Law and Insurance  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号