格式条款内容规制的规范体系

在规制合同内容的规范群内部存在着体系化的分工。格式条款内容规制规范不能适用于核心给付条款。其根本原因在于，市场机制通常虽不能作用于附随条款但却能作用于核心给付条款。这并不意味着核心给付条款就不受法律秩序的规制。对于不当合同的介入，通常需要合意度低下和均衡度不足两个要件的合力。合同法第40条的意义，在于将所有利用格式条款之情形的合意推定为程度较低的合意。如此一来，在对格式条款作内容规制时，便不再需要举证合意度的低下。

Normal System to Regulate the Content of Standard Terms

There is a systematic differentiation of labor among the norms to regulate the content of a contract. According to their different contents, the standard terms can be classified into the core presentation terms and the incidental terms. The norms to regulate the content of the standard terms cannot be applied to the core presentation terms. The fundamental reason is that, although the market mechanism usually cannot affect to the incidental terms, it can do to the core presentation terms. In the same time, this does not mean that the core presentation terms are free from the regulation of the legal order. The intervention into the contract depends usually on the composite force of two requirements, that is, the low degree of agreement and the inadequate degree of equilibrium between presentations. Article 40 of Chinese Contract Law establishes an inference that the degree of all the agreements concerning to the standard terms are low, so as to exempt the burden of proof when regulate the content of the standard terms. As to the identification of the core presentation terms, although there is not a general standard, there are several hints in the real world. As far as the typical contracts are concerned, the necessary requirements to establish the contracts belong to the core presentation terms. Besides, the terms providing the price are usually the core presentation terms, for the market mechanism can work. As to the non-typical contracts, the identification of the core presentation terms depends on the abstraction of their establishing requirements and the affection of the market on the concrete content of the contracts.