Reputation management by Chinese universities: Primary profile and comparative features |
| |
| Authors: | Tom Christensen S. Gabriela Gavrila Liang Ma Francisco O. Ramirez |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, Norway School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, China;2. Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, USA;3. School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, China |
| |
| Abstract: | In this study, we analyse data from 176 Chinese universities to examine the use of reputation symbols on official websites. We find that Chinese universities prefer professional and performative symbols more than moral symbols. Reputation symbols are mainly observed in teaching, research, history and strategy categories, whereas their use in internal operations and the external environment is limited. A comparison with samples from the United States and Nordic countries indicates that their universities differ in the use of reputation symbols, with relatively high emphasis on professional and moral symbols, respectively. This difference can be attributed to divergent national cultures, higher education regimes and globalization. Here, we discuss the implications of our findings on reputation management by universities in a globalized world. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
