| 普惠制的法律困境与未来之路 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘勇. 普惠制的法律困境与未来之路[J]. 广西政法管理干部学院学报, 2008, 23(2): 25-30 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘勇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 苏州大学王健法学院,江苏,苏州,215006 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 普惠制在GATT/WTO框架内的法律地位由GATT1971年的“豁免决定”和1979年的“授权条款”予以确立。因这两项法律文件缺乏约束性条款且无争端解决办法，为GSP在GATT／WTO框架内的推行所引发的法律争议埋下隐患。“印度诉欧盟关税优惠案”折射出的普惠制法律困境主要有：GSP项目的可诉性、“授权条款”与最惠国待遇原则的关系、GSP法律文件中“普遍的”、“非互惠”和“非歧视”要求与发达国家“有差别”、“有条件”地实施GSP间的矛盾。
|
| 关 键 词： | GSP 非歧视 非互惠 有条件 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-8628(2008)02-0025-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-11-16 |
On the GSP:Legal Dilemma and the Road Ahead |
| |
| LIU Yong. On the GSP:Legal Dilemma and the Road Ahead[J]. Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2008, 23(2): 25-30 |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Yong |
| |
| Affiliation: | LIU Yong (Kenneth Wang School of Law, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215006) |
| |
| Abstract: | The legal status of GSP within GATT/WTO was established by the Decision of 1971 and the Enabling Clause of 1979.Whereas the absence of o provision of obligation and dispute settlement in these two legal documents had resulted in legal disputes arising in enforcing GSP program within GATT/WTO.BY analyzing the WTO case "EC-Conditions for the Granting Tariff Preferences to Developing Countries",this article discuss:the application of WTO rules to GSP;the relation between Enabling Clause and MFN;the difference between "generalized","non-discriminatory","non-reciprocal" in GSP legal documents and "discrimination","conditionality" in GSP programs enforced by developed countries;the impact of GSP case and corresponding tactics of developing countries. |
| |
| Keywords: | GSP Non-discriminatory Non-reciprocal Conditionality |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
