从善意取得和表见代理制度谈另一种法律思维方式

关于善意取得的性质,有原始取得和继受取得之争。因为继受取得是基于他人既存的权利而取得物权,而善意取得中处分人欠缺处分权,以至处分人当然不享有物权,因而原始取得说成为通说。但是,原始取得说强调的是事实上是否有处分权,而笔者认为,不妨直接由第三人的视角定性善意取得为继受取得,补足处分权,因为是否存在处分权这一事实一开始对于第三人而言就是不存在的,是事后才了解的,而事后的了解是没有即时的法律意义的。本文以定性善意取得为起点,结合表见代理,对传统上纯粹由事实层面分析问题的思路提出质疑,并提出从另一个角度来思考问题的模式。

Talking about another Mode of Legal Thinking from the Nature of Acquirement in Good Faith and Appearance Agent System

About the nature of acquirement in good faith,there are two different statements：one is original acquisition,and the other is derivative acquisition.Derivative acquisition means someone gets the right from others ＇existing right.However,in this system,the granter doesn＇t have the right of disposition.Hence,the statement of original acquirement has become the conmen statement.However,the statement of original acquirement emphasizes that whether someone has the virtual right of disposition,but I think we＇d better define the nature from the view of the third party to make up the right of disposition,because the fact that whether the granter own the right of disposition is known later by the third party,which doesn＇t have immediate effect.This article,starting with determining the nature of acquirement in good faith,combining with appearance agent system,and show the author＇s query to the traditional way of thinking that analyzing the issue from the aspects of facts purely,and puts forward another mode of thinking.