| 诉讼证据的客观性争论刍议 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李明和,靳欣.诉讼证据的客观性争论刍议[J].政法学刊,2004,21(4):23-25. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李明和 靳欣 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 南京师范大学,法学院,江苏,南京,210046
2. 西北政法学院法学系,陕西,西安,710063 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 有学者提出的诉讼证据本质属性只有关联性、合法性而无客观性的观点引起学界的争论。笔者以为这种观点提出客观 性悖论以及对客观性的反思有积极意义,但也有研究方法唯心化、主客体混合客体观、定案根据与诉讼证据等同化三个错误。
|
| 关 键 词： | 诉讼证据 客观性 悖论 新二性说 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-3745(2004)04-0023-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年2月16日 |
A Discussion on the Objectiveness of Procedural Evidence |
| |
| Li Ming-he,QIN Xin.A Discussion on the Objectiveness of Procedural Evidence[J].Journal of Political Science and Law,2004,21(4):23-25. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Ming-he QIN Xin |
| |
| Abstract: | Some scholars have proposed that the essence of procedural evidence is relativity and reasonability rather than objectivity, which stirs up great disputes in law circle. This opinion has some positive aspects in the sense that it has encouraged reflections towards the objectiveness of procedural evidence. However, it also has some defects in it. |
| |
| Keywords: | procedural evidence objectiveness argument |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
