| 我国法定抵押权制度的若干立法构想 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李建华,董彪. 我国法定抵押权制度的若干立法构想[J]. 当代法学, 2006, 0(2) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李建华 董彪 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 吉林大学法学院 吉林长春130012(李建华)，中国人民大学法学院 北京100872(董彪) |
| |
| 基金项目： | 司法部“法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目:我国物权立法若干疑难问题研究”(项目编号01SFB2008) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 法定抵押权制度源于古罗马法,在近现代民法法典化的过程中,由于社会背景和知识谱系的差异,分化为以德国、日本和瑞士为代表的三种立法体例。文章围绕法定抵押权的基础及类型化、公示方法的设计和优先次序的安排等问题,分析和比较了其他国家和地区的立法,系统地阐释了法定抵押权制度的相关理论,试探性地提出了构建我国法定抵押权制度的若干立法建议。
|
| 关 键 词： | 立法构想 类型化 公示方法 优先次序 条文设计 |
The Construction of Legislation of Legal Mortgage in China |
| |
| LI Jian-hua,DONG Biao. The Construction of Legislation of Legal Mortgage in China[J]. Contemporary Law Review, 2006, 0(2) |
| |
| Authors: | LI Jian-hua DONG Biao |
| |
| Affiliation: | LI Jian-hua~1,DONG Biao~2 |
| |
| Abstract: | The system of legal mortgage was originated from Roman law,and separated into three legislation styles namely the German,Japanese and Swiss style based on different social context and knowledge pedigree.In this article,with the analysis of legislations in different countries and regions,relative theories on legal mortgage,such as the base and categorization,the method of publication and the arrangement of priority,are discussed,and advice on legislation in this field is provided. |
| |
| Keywords: | construction of legislation categorization method of publication priority plan of provisions |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
