首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

法律现实主义的演变及对中国法治的思考——倡导纠纷解决机制多元化
引用本文:马云红.法律现实主义的演变及对中国法治的思考——倡导纠纷解决机制多元化[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2008(3).
作者姓名:马云红
作者单位:中国政法大学法学院 北京100088
摘    要:创建一个民主、法制的社会环境是构建和谐社会的必要条件之一。如何构建民主、法制的社会环境.吉尔莫的经典叙述告诉我们对于纠纷的解决依赖于一系列多元化的纠纷解决机制。我们通过从传统法律现实主义到新法律现实主义的历史演变的描述,以及对二者思想的分析对比,可以总结归纳出一些现代法治国家可以借鉴的思想和方法。对于发展中的中国来说,也许这些方法有助于确定和保证达到法治和社会和谐的较佳程度。

关 键 词:传统法律现实主义  新法律现实主义  多元化纠纷解决机制  行动中的法

The Evolvement of Legal Realism and Its Meaning to Chinas Rule of Law——Promotion of Diverse Mechanisms for Dispute Resolution
Authors:MA Yun-hong
Institution:MA Yun-hong
Abstract:Creation of a democratic and legal social environment is one of the requirements of forming a harmonic society.Grant Gilmore's classic reasoning tells us that the resolution to legal disputes lies in a series of diverse resolution mechanisms rather than exhaustive laws.This article describes the historical evolvement from traditional legal realism to new legal realism,compares and contrasts the thoughts of these two,and summarizes a few thoughts and methods to which legal states can refer,such as the research on "law in action","bottom-up" observation and investigation etc.While the author doesn't accept and absorb the thoughts and methods of new legal realism completely,such thoughts and methods may determine and ensure a better legal and social harmony for China,which is still in the developing stage.Finally,the author illustrates the development and progress of "diverse dispute resolution" in China by quoting the evolving history of mediation.
Keywords:traditional legal realism  new legal realism  diverse mechanisms for dispute resolution  law in action  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号