首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

在软法与硬法之间:裁量基准效力的法理定位
引用本文:周佑勇. 在软法与硬法之间:裁量基准效力的法理定位[J]. 法学论坛, 2009, 0(4)
作者姓名:周佑勇
作者单位:东南大学法学院;
基金项目:2008年度国家社会科学基金项目《行政裁量基准制度研究》(08BFX020)的阶段性成果
摘    要:在认识软法的效力和功能时,不能忽视软法与硬法之间的复杂关联性。软法作为"法"除了具有"软约束力"之外,也能够借助于某种硬法保障方式或机制发挥"硬"的作用。就裁量基准的效力而言,其对内的拘束力主要是基于行政机关的领导权或监督权而产生,并往往通过行政机关内部激励、评议考核和责任追究等自我约束机制来实现。同时,裁量基准作为软法的范畴,不能直接为法院所适用,但是借助于立法授权旨意要求的说明理由制度以及裁量基准自身体现出来的法律原则的适用效力等硬法保障机制,也可以获得一种间接的司法适用,从而产生对外的法律效力。

关 键 词:裁量基准  软法  法律效力  

Between Soft Law and Hard Law:the Orientation of Discretion Standard Effect in Jurisprudence
ZHOU You-yong. Between Soft Law and Hard Law:the Orientation of Discretion Standard Effect in Jurisprudence[J]. Legal Forum, 2009, 0(4)
Authors:ZHOU You-yong
Affiliation:Law School;Southeast University;Nanjing Jiangsu 211189;China
Abstract:It will not neglect the complex relevancy between soft law and hard law when we recognize the effect and function of soft law. Soft law as "law" besides has "the soft binging force" ,can also draw support from some safeguard way or mechanism of hard law to display "hard" function. On the discretion standard effect,the generation of its internal binging is mainly based on the leadership or supervisory authority of the administrative departments,and the achievement of it always through the self-restraint mech...
Keywords:discretion standard  soft law  legal effect  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号