| 自愿承受风险原则研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 梁亚,李延生. 自愿承受风险原则研究[J]. 河北法学, 2007, 25(3): 186-190 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 梁亚 李延生 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京大学,法学院,北京,100871;石家庄市长安区人民检察院,河北,石家庄,050000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 自愿承受风险在美国侵权法中是被告可以主张的绝对抗辩.以自愿承受风险原则的发展历程为线索,对自愿承受风险的起源与发展、自愿承受风险的各种形态以及比较过失制度对自愿承受风险的影响进行介绍与评析,揭示了自愿承受风险原则在美国侵权法中所经历的沉浮与变迁.
|
| 关 键 词： | 自愿承受风险 起源 形态 促成过失 比较过失 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-3933(2007)03-0186-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-11-23 |
A Study on the "Assumption of Risk" Doctrine in Torts of America |
| |
| LIANG Ya,LI Yan-sheng. A Study on the "Assumption of Risk" Doctrine in Torts of America[J]. Hebei Law Science, 2007, 25(3): 186-190 |
| |
| Authors: | LIANG Ya LI Yan-sheng |
| |
| Abstract: | In torts of America,the assumption of risk doctrine is an absolute defense which can be raised by defendants.For the purpose of demonstrating the ups and downs of the assumption risk doctrine,this article explores the origin of the doctrine,illustrates its various types and analyzes the impact of comparative negligence on it. |
| |
| Keywords: | assumption of risk origin types contributory negligence comparative negligence |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
