刑法“但书”的误用与澄清——以醉驾一律入刑的争论为视角

对危险驾驶罪适用但书是对其功能的夸大和误读,从但书的性质分析,在立法价值上体现谦抑主义精神,表现为犯罪概念与定性与定量的结合。从司法意义上看,但书既不具有单独适用宣告无罪的功能,也不具有形式符合构成要件后又排斥犯罪成立的效力,但书是从属于评价犯罪的构成要件标准说的提示性、注意性规定。从立法本意与犯罪性质的分析看,醉酒驾驶类危险驾驶中情节因素只可以作为量刑依据,不影响定罪。

Misuse and Clarification of the Proviso in the Criminal Law --from the Debate over Whether All Drunk Driving Is Criminal

The application of the proviso to crimes of functions. Analyzing the nature of the proviso, bines the concept of crimes and qualitative and dangerous driving exaggerates and misunderstands its it shows a spirit of being modest in the legislative value and comquantitative. From the judicial sense, the proviso has neither the legislative intent and the analysis of criminal nature, the circumstances in drunk driving which can be seen as dangerous driving can only affect the sentencing but not the crimination.