首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

查处毒品犯罪中的疑难问题与解决问题的思路
引用本文:崔敏. 查处毒品犯罪中的疑难问题与解决问题的思路[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2004, 20(6): 1-7
作者姓名:崔敏
作者单位:中国人民公安大学,北京,100038
摘    要:毒品案件的侦查同普通刑事案件有明显区别,而与侦破危害国家安全的特务、间谍案件有类似之处。实践中,对如何认定当事人对其持有的毒品是否“明知”;毒品案件当事人反驳指控应否承担部分举证责任;如何区分“运输、贩卖”和“非法持有”;如何使用技侦手段获取的证据;缉毒警察是否应当出庭作证;如何对待“诱惑侦查”;如何对待打“预谋贩毒案件”;如何纠正偏重口供的倾向;如何落实“坦白从宽”政策;对于运输毒品罪判处死刑应否从严控制;地区管辖可否增加破案机关所在地法院管辖;关键同案人未归案的,办案期限能否放宽等问题存在着难点。可借鉴国外的有关法律规定和通行做法,并结合我国国情,修改有关方面的立法。同时,侦查部门应转变观念,改进方法,提高效益。

关 键 词:查处毒品犯罪  疑难问题  解决思路
文章编号:1672-2140(2004)06-0001-07

Hard-cases and Resolving Thinking in Investigation and Prosecution of Drug Crimes
CUI Min. Hard-cases and Resolving Thinking in Investigation and Prosecution of Drug Crimes[J]. Journal of Chinese People‘s Public Security University:Social Sciences Edition, 2004, 20(6): 1-7
Authors:CUI Min
Abstract:Investigation of drug cases, is different from that of common criminal cases, and is similar to special criminal cases such as spy and espionage agent violating national safety. In practice, there are many difficulties to cognizance the full awareness of the party who holds drug, to cognizance a part evidential burden by the party who is in drug case, and to tell the drug transportation, drug traffic and illegal drug hold. So, we should revise the legislation concerned on our national situation with learning and using the legislative experience of other countries for reference.
Keywords:investigation and prosecution of drug crimes  hard-cases  resolving thinking  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号